This post reprinted from the blog Texas Darlin, originally titled “Minefield” here
A Constitutional Minefield
By Judah Benjamin, Guest Author
Ladies and gentlemen, I keep telling you I’m not a Lawyer but that I have studied Law. Now one of the reasons I’m not a Lawyer is that I have neither read nor studied The Federal Code of Civil Procedure, I could never be bothered and never needed to because Law concerns me as it impacts certain Historical events or actions. Philip J Berg, Esq, on the other hand is a Lawyer and has read it. I direct you to:
…where Jeff Schreiber has devoted all of his spare time to looking at the case. (Thank you beyond measure, Jeff, I don’t know where you get the time and energy. You are a hero, and Republican, or not, I hope you end up as Chief Justice.) Go to Jeff’s site, I don’t care if he’s a Republican, he’s the man who is in contact with the Court and with Berg and who breaks the news the minute it comes out.
Berg has struck back with a Procedural bombshell!
A motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and
B) A motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg’s motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted.
These motions are based on Rule 36 of The Federal Code of Civil Procedure. This Rule, it seems, states that “a party upon whom requests for admissions have been served must respond, within 30 days, or else the matters in the requests will be automatically deemed conclusively admitted for purposes of the pending action.”
Needless to say, Obama and the DNC have NOT made any Legal admissions, or answers to the allegations, at all since September 15th, at least none of which Berg is aware and he should be if they have.
If Judge Surrick grants these motions, Barack Hussein Obama II is, at least temporarily, neither eligible for the Office of POTUS nor a Citizen of the United States, in Law. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted by bcrp 
