Republican Corner: The Grand Old (Un-electable?) Party of California?

November 30, 2010

By Post Scripts on November 20, 2010 10:30 AM3 Comments

Votermap2010.jpg

 
By Steve Thompson, Chairman of the Butte County Republican Party

In the last twenty years or so, American politics have seemed to become more divisive. There are a lot of theories out there on why this is, which range from the cultural (Bowling Alone) technological (internet) and ultra-political (right-left takeovers). My own theory incorporates some of all of these, but I believe that politics pre-Reagan was less combative because Republicans before Reagan had very few principles that differentiated them from the democrats. They also were unable to get elected outside of country club circles. It wasn’t until Republicans started to actually stand for real American values and won Congress that democrats went totally ballistic and threw fits like the demon-possessed getting holy water thrown on them. That’s my humble observation at least.

Whatever the case of national political turmoil, it’s funny to watch pundits after each election declaring the end to any given political movement or party. After the election of Barrack Hussein Obama in 2008, there were a lot of statements made about the death of conservatism, for example. After 1994 I’m sure a lot of Republicans also thought the democrats wouldn’t be coming back either. Right now a lot California political pundits are asking if Republicans can ever get elected in this state again. While California is certainly a difficult state for Republicans, I would wager the fight’s not over here. Why do I say that? Because I have patience friends.

All I have to do is wait for the democrats, who now completely run this shipwreck-bound state, to be themselves.

California is already in deep deficits. Put bluntly, we spend more than we make in tax revenue. We also have over 12% unemployment, with no real hope of it getting better. The majority of job growth in the U.S. right now is in states like Texas, and our policies are the exact opposite of theirs. High unemployment means more people who need money from the system. Our state is borrowing money from the feds just to pay people on unemployment. This doesn’t account for our welfare spending either, where people have moved to California for our higher than average welfare payments and we now carry a third of the national welfare caseload.

So while Jerry Brown actually campaigned on being a miser with our money, he was voted in by those who are expecting him to pay their bills (not unlike Obama). While Republicans have lost the albatross of Arnold Schwarzenegger hanging around our necks, the dems have made one of our state’s worst past governors the new face of their party. It’s telling that, in his election night acceptance speech, Jerry Brown actually used the pathetic phrase “good enough for government work.” Way to set your standards high, Governor.

I would love to be hopeful that California is going to recover soon, but I can’t see how that is possible. Democrats pay lip service to jobs but their policies are destroying jobs in the private sector. Without a private sector, you cannot support government jobs for very long. Jerry Brown’s father actually did build dams and create infrastructure, but today’s democrat party only wants to tear dams down. The worst is far from over as democrat legislation such as AB32, which we were unable to suspend this year, will come back and destroy a million more jobs in this state.

Seriously, does anyone who disagrees with me have any real hope or reason that our state can improve with the left at the helm? Can they really make an argument that killing the private sector will be good for our economy over the long haul? Democrats may have won, but I doubt the smart ones in their ranks are celebrating.

Over the next two years democrats will create a perfect storm, Obama style, that will give Republicans another shot at taking back California. Like the national battle that saw us take back Congress, it will not be easy. We must give California voters something to vote for and not just be the lesser of two evils. We must continue to remind voters that we are the party of jobs, while democrats are the party of higher taxes and economic misery. Democrats will help us by proving to voters they are the party of epic failure. Will we stand strong and convey our message that we are the party of success? Time will tell, but for California’s sake, I hope so.

 


November 17, 2010

Republican Corner: California Voters Compared to Lindsay Lohan
By Post Scripts on November 12, 2010 6:00 AM 

Dear Readers: Having spent Veterans Day with my wife and kids I didn’t prepare a column for this week. However I ran across this story from a former Californian who had some tough commentary on our recent election. I will be on duty this weekend and unable to respond to posts but please do enjoy and see you next week!

I found the following article in the Wall Street Journal
Steve

By Allysia Finley

Listen up, California. The other 48 states–your cousin New York excluded–are sick of your bratty arrogance. You’re the Lindsay Lohan of states: a prima donna who once showed some talent but is now too wasted to do anything with it.
After enjoying ephemeral highs and spending binges, you suffer crashes that culminate in brief, unsuccessful stints in rehab. This cycle repeats itself every five to 10 years, as the rest of the country looks on with a mixture of horror and amusement. We’d feel sorry for you if you didn’t constantly flip us the bird.
Instead, we’re making bets on how long it will be before your next meltdown. Oh, wait–you’re already melting down.
You’ve racked up nearly $70 billion in general obligation debt, and that doesn’t include your $500 billion unfunded pension liability. Your own analysts predict you’ll face a hole of at least $80 billion over the next four years.
Your government’s run by a brothel of environmentalists, lawyers, public-sector unions and legislative bums. When they’re not taxing or spending, they’re creating regulations and commissions like the Board of Barbering and Cosmetology and the California Blueberry Commission. Many businesses would leave if it weren’t for your sunny climate.

Which may explain why you’re so obsessed with climate change. If your climate changes, no one, including your Hollywood friends, would tolerate you anymore. So you’ve created a law to tax carbon emissions–no matter that it will kill jobs.
It’s not as if you don’t recognize that you’ve got problems. Roughly three-quarters of you say you’re headed in the wrong direction, according to a recent survey by the Public Policy Institute of California. You’re even more depressed than Illinois and New York, and you’ve got sunshine 10 months of the year!
You appropriately give your government low marks–28% approval for outgoing Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, 16% for the legislature–yet you continue to re-elect the politicians who got you into this mess. Not a single incumbent state legislator lost re-election this year, including one Democrat who died a month ago (no joke). What’s scarier is that you’ve just given almost all of the keys to statewide offices to Democrats.
Jerry Brown will be your new (old) governor. This is the man who acted as a gateway drug to your spending addiction three decades ago when he gave public-sector employees collective bargaining rights. Helping enforce your wacky laws will be Lt. Gov-elect Gavin Newsom, the San Francisco mayor who flouted state law by allowing same-sex marriage. On the plus side, he has nice hair and loves you just the way you are. This is what he had to say after winning his race:

“We’re nothing but a mirror of our consistent thoughts. You tend to manifest what you focus on. If you look around for what’s wrong, you’ll find it. But as all we know up here in San Francisco, when you focus on what’s right, you see it all around you. . . . There is absolutely nothing wrong with California that can’t be fixed by what’s right with California. . . . If you’re from another state, you’d love to have the problems of California.”
You’ve also just re-elected Barbara Boxer (that’s Senator Barbara Boxer) to a fourth term. She boasted on election night that it’s her “eleventh straight election victory, and what a sweet one it is . . . [since] everything was thrown at us, including the kitchen sink, and the stove and the oven and everything, millions of dollars of negative ads from known and unknown opponents, millions and millions of dollars.”
We’ve tried to help you, California. Some spent millions on campaigns to entice you to change your reckless behavior. And you told them to kick rocks.
So here’s our final warning: When you inevitably crash and burn, don’t count on us to bail you out.

Ms. Finley, a lapsed Californian who still wears Birkenstocks, is an assistant editor of OpinionJournal.com.


November 5, 2010

Republican Corner: Chairman’s Report
By Post Scripts on November 5, 2010 6:00 AM | No Comments

By Steve Thompson, Chairman of the Butte County Republican Party

Writer’s note: It is customary for the county chair to report on election results each season, with a hope to improve in the coming years. Now that the election is over, I hope to use some future column space talking about the structure of our party, as well writing about some non-political topics I’ve always been interested in. As always, thank you for reading my column and do feel free to comment.

I would like to start by thanking everyone who helped out this year at Republican Headquarters. We absolutely could not make it without a strong volunteer force, the majority of which came from the local Republican Women organization and members of the TEA Party.

It seems the results are a pretty mixed bag this year, with some wins and some losses. That’s better than two years ago when we were looking at only losses, but there’s still a lot of ground to gain if we’re going to save our great nation.

I’m proud of the gains conservatives made nationwide. America has recognized Obama’s leftist agenda for what it is and decisively dumped it in the trash. Unfortunately California (which used to lead the way politically) has chosen big government programs and European socialism over jobs and economic prosperity. With both Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, who ran two different campaigns yet both losing, it is clear that democrat voters simply outnumber republicans in this state. As more and more producers and earners leave for greener pastures, while more and more non-producers seeking public assistance move here, we are leering ever closer towards the tipping of the cart and ultimate collapse of our state’s budget.

On the local level we have some decent results to be proud of. State Republican candidates carried Butte County very handily. We also had some gains at the city level. Tim Titus (Paradise), Cheri Bunker (Oroville), and Mark Sorensen (Chico), all non-incumbents endorsed and backed by the Butte GOP, won their races for city council. Our own Angela Thompson received the highest number of votes in her re-election to the Biggs City Council. Oroville’s mayoral race was actually between two republicans, and we extend our congratulations and support to Linda Dahlmeier, Oroville’s new mayor.

In the days leading up to election, our volunteers made literally thousands of phone calls and door to door contacts with local voters. We also registered over 1,400 republican voters in the last 3 months, possibly breaking some of our old records with numbers we haven’t seen since the 90′s! Perhaps most importantly, we are seeing the various factions of our local party, slowly but surely, coming back into the same room and working together. I think this bodes well for 2012.

Obviously not all local results were rosy. We supported several candidates for school board who tried very hard but didn’t make it. Worthy of special note would be Rachelle Zucholillo of Paradise, whose “in your face” campaign against the teachers unions earned her the nickname of “the scrappy mom” candidate.

We were also displeased to see liberals maintain control of the Chico City Council. Chico is a beautiful city with literally no jobs or future for graduates of our local college. Yet those same students continue to vote against their economic interests on the dubious advice of their professors. Normally I’d be hopeful that they might see the light when they join the workforce and start paying taxes, but there’s no work to be found in this state anymore.

And jobs, finally, is what it really boils down too. You can’t have jobs without business anymore than you can have transportation without oil. The left has foolishly taught themselves to despise both, and the left now controls California completely. The loss of Prop 23 means the loss of at least a million more jobs for our state. I wonder which liberal city will be the first to stand brave on their principles and ban all gas stations? Time will tell. In the meantime I suspect Jerry Brown will become to California what Obama was to America. He will recruit more voters for the Republicans and bring about a sweeping change of the legislature. Wishful thinking or not, we will be there to help make it happen.

Two years ago, when I was a new chairman and Obama had taken the White House, Republicans felt demoralized and downtrodden. I have enjoyed this season thoroughly, and appreciate all of our new friends in the TEA Party movement. Together we have new hope and vigor, and we are coming back to throw Obama out in 2012.


GET OUT AND VOTE!

November 2, 2010

CHECK OUT THE “CAMPAIGNS” TAB TO VIEW THE LIST OF CANDIDATES ENDORSED BY THE BUTTE COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY!


VICTORY PARTY!!!

November 2, 2010

Join us in celebrating candidate victory tonight at 896 East Ave in the old Hollywood Video building, 7:00 p.m. – Polls close at 8:00 p.m.


October 25, 2010

Republican Corner: America, Recover!

By Post Scripts on October 22, 2010 6:00 AM7 Comments

statue-of-liberty-america-flag.jpg
By Steve Thompson, Chairman of the Butte County Republican Party

Writers note: If you agree with this writer and want to help out, come to Chico Republican HQ, 896 East ave. this Saturday at 9:00am and help us take back our country.
In the roughly twenty years I’ve been politically involved, I can’t remember a time as pivotal as now. Darkness and misery on one side, prosperity and hope on the other. Perhaps we saw the warning signs (an overzealous environmental movement, tax and spend democrats creating deficits, socialism preached in the classrooms) but for so long so many of us thought it wouldn’t affect us personally. Until it did.

Look at where our country is right now. So far this year, 1 in 10 American homeowners missed a mortgage payment, 1 in 6 Americans are unemployed or left the workforce (BTW, if you’re a student out of college who can’t find work, they don’t count you as unemployed!), over 4 in 10 have been out of work for over six months, and 1 in 4 Americans have negative equity on their home mortgage. Pretty bleak proof that stimulus spending didn’t do much good, and chances are you know someone who is suffering right now as a result of the economy.

Negativity against positive solutions persists though. In California voters face tough battles to retake their government from entrenched bureaucrats. Despite a failing private sector and hundreds of thousands of lost jobs, the liberal stranglehold on government remains strong. But even they know the end is near. They know that you can’t fund bloated government without business, and that drastic cuts will have to be made to maintain the draconian regulations they impose. They know and don’t care. There is no one less compassionate for the suffering of others than a left-wing activist. They know their policies are destroying our middle class and will drive people out of our state, and they don’t care. Truth be known they relish the pain, as they see America as over privileged and unjustly prosperous to begin with. This is truly the darkness in the heart of our country.

Despite all of this, optimism remains. The rising strength of the American TEA parties gives hope to middle class voters who have been disenfranchised by government elites. There is a growing sense that they can take back their country and restore sanity to our government’s policies. Nationwide it is likely that Republicans will seize control of Congress from the Democrats. Even the Senate may change parties this year. Voters will see the power of their vote actualized at the polls, and will know that they can make a difference.

We are making gains with voters not traditionally on our side. Prop 23 showed an 18 point advantage with latino voters. It makes sense as there’s not a whole lot of ethnicity in the environmental movement. The face of California’s environmental movement is an upper-income white guy trying to save the world from his condo in San Francisco. He likely won’t lose his financial job due to AB32. A lot of minorities in California will.

America is truly at a crossroads this year, and the impact of our decision means more now than ever before. The stakes are higher for all of us. Will we listen to those who despise American prosperity and wish to encumber our children with government debt and loss of personal freedom? Or, will we place our hope and faith in those who believe America’s best days are still in front of us, as the TEA parties have? I think the answer lies in the optimism of our fellow Americans, and not in their pessimism. Ronald Reagan called our nation a shining city on the hill. America is reaching for it once more.

 


October 16, 2010

Republican Corner: Chuck Norris on Washington

By Post Scripts on October 15, 2010 6:07 AM1 Comment

Chuck Norris.jpg

Dear Readers,
In the final weeks of campaign season I am really pressed for time, so I am sharing with you some written work from famous actor and conservative writer Chuck Norris. I think you’ll be pleased to know that Mr. Norris is actually a pretty thoughtful and intelligent writer. Not to mention he is so tough that comedians write continuous jokes about his deadly abilities, but always anonymously.Republican Corner will be back soon with more fun light to shed on liberal corruption. Enjoy!
Steve Thompson

The Feds’ Disease: Spending! (Part 1)
By Chuck Norris

We all know ad nauseam that Washington’s spending is completely foolish and totally out of control. But will we show ourselves to be equally misguided by allowing those same bureaucratic bandits to stay in office?

Since World War II, federal spending has remained roughly between 18 and 22 percent of gross domestic product. Under President George W. Bush, spending increased from 18.4 to 20.9 percent of GDP. Since President Barack Obama took office, revenues have fallen by $381 billion and spending has increased by $508 billion, increasing the deficit from $459 billion to $1.35 trillion. Non-defense discretionary spending alone has jumped 28 percent.

According to the Congressional Budget Office analysis released Sept. 7, by the end of fiscal year 2010 (Sept. 30), there was another deficit of at least $1.3 trillion — what the CBO labeled “the second-largest shortfall in the past 65 years,” second to last year’s deficit of 9.9 percent of GDP. Even if all the Bush tax cuts were repealed, the CBO concludes that the deficit still would be nearly $1.1 trillion in 2011.

The cumulative deficit from 2010 to 2019 under the president’s proposals would total $9.3 trillion. Washington projects the debt to top $24.5 trillion by the end of the decade, even exceeding the GDP projection for 2019 ($22.8 trillion).

Back in August, President Obama asked, “How do we, over the long term, get control of our deficit?” That’s a great question, Mr. President.

The CBO made one strong and simple recommendation: Stop spending so much. Is that really economic rocket science? The CBO’s recent report reinforced exactly what we already knew: The feds still are spending out of control.

Isn’t our nation seeking to recover from a recession? Then why would the federal government spend so recklessly?

Do the following sound like the fiscally responsible people and plan you want in office?

–In a mere 31 months, Congress has added more than $4.4 trillion to the 10-year spending base line. In 2005, total federal spending was only $2.47 trillion. (What about that recession the Obama administration “inherited”?)

–Even as the economy recovers and war spending decreases, the projected budget deficit never drops below $1 trillion and reaches nearly $2 trillion by 2020.

–And how about all the frivolous spending, such as the incredible $192 million splurge-fest in taxpayer money to plaster every possible highway with signs touting how stimulus cash is “Putting America to Work” with infrastructure projects?

–From 2009-20, it is estimated that the Troubled Asset Relief Program will cost $67 billion. The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailouts are estimated to cost $190 billion.

–And of course, let’s not forget the string of massive debts spent by Obama under the guise of “economic stimuli,” including the $787 billion stimulus bill, the $410 billion omnibus spending bill (with 9,000 earmarks — 60 percent Democratic in origin) and the $634 billion required for a down payment for universal health care (debt No. 4). And all of that doesn’t include other so-called “economic stimuli” deemed necessary on the fed’s horizon, as Daniel Inouye, the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, noted when he called the mammoth $787 billion spending bill “stimulus No. 1.”

–According to the Bureau of the Public Debt, as of Aug. 20, after just the first 19 months of President Obama’s four-year term, the public debt grew to $8.83 trillion, an increase of $2.53 trillion.

This present administration promised hope and change, but all we are getting is more of the same.

President Obama spoke out of one side of his mouth a while back when giving financial advice to the people in New Hampshire. “When times are tough, you tighten your belts,” he said. “You don’t go buying a boat when you can barely pay your mortgage. You don’t blow a bunch of cash in Vegas when you’re trying to save for college.”

But he then spoke out of the other side of his mouth when he informed the American public that he was proposing a record-breaking $3.8 trillion budget for fiscal year 2011, which equates to spending $7.3 million a minute. (The federal budget was only $1.9 trillion in 2001.)

It has been estimated by watchdog organizations that the government wastes nearly $1 trillion every year. That is a staggering amount, especially when one considers the annual federal budget is roughly $4 trillion.

Even liberal media predicted that Obama’s spending would “leave a string of deficits dwarfing any in the nation’s history.” And they were right.

If our country is to survive, let alone again thrive, we must elect only those who show proof of fiscal discipline, refuse under all circumstances to increase our national deficit, disdain special interests, commit to pass and live under a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget, and would cut spending radically.

Time is running out, but it’s not too late to reverse Washington’s fiscal frenzy. But you only have a couple of days left to register to vote, if you haven’t already. Check your state’s registration deadlines at http://www.register-vote.com. And you can download the voter registration form for your state at http://www.eac.gov. Click on “Resources for Voters” and then “Register To Vote.”

The future generations of America are counting and depending on us.

(Next week, I will give a specific plan and strategies for reining in and cutting federal spending. For a more exhaustive treatment of that plan based upon our Founders’ fiscal prudence and wisdom, please see the chapter titled “Stop America’s Nightmare of Debt” in the paperback expansion of my latest New York Times best-seller, “Black Belt Patriotism.”)


October 8, 2010

Major Study shows Prop 23 will save thousands of jobs

By Post Scripts on October 8, 2010 6:00 AMNo Comments

Prop23.png

Report shared by Steve Thompson, Chairman of the Butte County Republican Party

Major Study Predicts Job Gains if Prop 23 Passes
Respected economist Ben Zycher recently completed this study for the Pacific Research Institute. It shows the massive numbers of jobs we stand to gain if Proposition 23 passes in November, or how many we stand to lose if it doesn’t.

Here is the forward from Zycher here:

“The California electorate next month will vote on Proposition 23, which would suspend the implementation of the state’s global warming (i.e., energy taxation) law (“AB32″) until the unemployment rate reaches 5.5 percent for four consecutive quarters. My new paper on the employment effects of this initiative can be found in the link below.

In a nutshell: Based upon official estimates of the reduction in state energy use attendant upon implementation of AB32, Proposition 23 would increase California employment by over half a million in 2012, and over 1.3 million in 2020. (Total employment in 2009 was about 16.2 million.) Not a trivial benefit from suspending a law the original justification for which was — I am not kidding — “California has to be a leader,” a shallow rationale even by the standards of political sloganeering. The California unemployment rate stands at 12.4 percent; it will be interesting to see if the voters in this deep-blue state will choose to turn away from a regulatory juggernaut promising massive costs and, literally, no benefits”.

And here is the full report here

As most of you know I am an avid supporter of Proposition 23, and in the honor of full disclosure I also work for Assemblyman Logue who authored this proposition. I do realize that there are arguments to be made for environmental reform, but I believe this report makes clear the gravity of our situation. The earth might need environmental reforms, but California cannot afford to do it alone, nor would we have any success if we tried. Attempting to do so will live us economically crippled, and unable to enact real change, baby steps if you will, towards a cleaner environment. It is clear that Proposition 23 must be passed if our state is ever to recover from the endless national recession.

Thank you for reading. It is my honor to serve both in the Republican Party, and as a writer here at Post Scripts.


September 27, 2010

Republican Corner: Budget Talk
By Post Scripts on September 24, 2010 6:00 AM | 2 Comments

By Steve Thompson, Chairman of the Butte County Republican Party

I wanted to give all of our readers a heads up that the CA State Legislature may very well be holding budget votes soon. It is rumored that legislators will be called to the capitol on Monday. In light of this I thought I’d spend a moment talking about the budget process and why it’s so late this year.

As you all know, the two houses of the California Legislature have to agree and pass a budget before it gets sent to the Governor for his signature. That means that 80 assemblymembers and 40 state senators have to reach an agreement. Both houses have democrat majorities and so the democrats, namely Assembly Speaker John Perez and Senate Pro Tem Darrel Steinberg, have the power to call for a vote on any issue. In California, it takes a 2/3 majority to raise taxes or to pass a budget, so republicans have more leverage with democrats here than on other issues.

As I mentioned, the democrat leadership in the legislature can call for a vote on the budget at any time. They could have locked legislators in the building way back in June and forced a vote, had they wanted to. Instead we are now in late September and we have broken a record for the latest budget yet.

The sticking points for this budget remain the same as last year. Republicans want to cut spending and Democrats want to raise your taxes. The state is bringing in less revenue than what it spends. Currently we’re roughly $19 billion in the hole. There is no possible way to close a gap this large without making cuts to program (entitlement) spending. There is simply not enough money left to pinch with tax increases.

In the next week you will hear a lot of cries about evil republicans and how they want to starve children and old people. The public employee unions will probably spend millions attacking them in advertisements. This is because they know we cannot cut spending without firing a lot of state employees. I realize that this sounds bad, but consider that CA state government has grown over 40% in the last decade. While the private sector is having to cut back and lay off millions, government jobs have been relatively safe. What’s worse, they want you to pay for it all.

Unfortunately, as I already stated, there is not enough money to tax out of the people. Even if we raise taxes and put even more taxpayers into default on their mortgages just to pay government, it won’t be enough to close the gap. Last year, the CA legislature passed the biggest tax increase in state history. That’s right, Republican legislators crossed over and compromised the way liberals wanted them too. Sadly we ended up with less revenues coming in after the tax increase than before. Further proof that tax increases do not work!

It is time for California to cinch up its belt and cut the fat. Our state budget is more bloated now than ever, and the only way we will balance our budget is to drastically cut spending. It will not be pretty or fun. There are millions in this state depending on assistance from those who produce. In fact, while 12% of our nation’s population lives in California, we shoulder over 30% of the welfare burden. It’s time for some other states to start pitching in and helping those in need. California can no longer shoulder the load.

For those of you who do not like seeing our budget so terribly in the red. Consider all the businesses we have driven out of our state with excessive regulations and taxation. Consider all the jobs and tax revenues that those businesses create. If you want a prosperous state, you have to have a prosperous business climate. If what you prefer is draconian environmental laws that give us no freedom to breathe, than be prepared for massive unemployment and suffering. The grapes of wrath are right here folks. Hope you enjoy the taste.


September 18, 2010

POST SCRIPTS
Republican Corner: Party Endorsements
By Post Scripts on September 17, 2010 6:00 AM | 10 Comments

By Steve Thompson, Chairman of the Butte County Republican Party

Ever wonder how candidates for office come by their endorsements from the political parties that support them? While visions of smoke-filled rooms may fill your head, it’s a lot more bureaucratic (and boring) than that. The subject of endorsements by the Butte Republican Party came up in the newspaper recently, specifically in local non partisan races, and as chairman I wanted to take this opportunity to explain some of our policies to the general public.

I should make clear that the party has not always endorsed in local non partisan races. I can remember several years ago I was at our republican fair booth and a former chairman of the party showed up. He saw that we had a Wahl for City Council sign up and gave me heck for it. It wasn’t how things were done in his day I guess.

Over the last decade the Republican Party, both locally and nationwide, has been going through an internal reformation. The moderate wing and the conservative wing have been in a tight contest for control, with the future of our party hanging in the balance. Many of us in the conservative wing feel that the party should be more active at the local level, and that we should do whatever we can to help identify conservative candidates at the local level and give them our support. Non partisan races were originally intended to limit partisan influence, but the partisan influence was never removed, just moved to the background. The downside is that now voters have a hard time knowing where the candidates stand on issues that matter to them.

You see, if I look at a ballot and I see the designation of “R” or “D,” I may not know for sure what that candidate stands for, but at least I have an idea of their general views. Take away the designation and now I have very little to go on. The remedy to this of course is for voters to educate themselves better, but time is limited and the local races often go overlooked. The result is that a conservative voter might end up voting for a very liberal candidate (and vice versa), which will eventually tend to frustrate and disenfranchise voters. For example, a few years ago, college students who were registered Republican received letters stating that Scott Gruendel was “the Republican Choice” for city council. Anyone who knows Gruendel knows this is false, but many students were likely fooled. Had they been able to see Gruendel’s registration on the ballot, they could have made a more educated choice. In the long run I believe partisan designations are good for the political process.

There is also the annoying occurrence of slate mailers. You know those mailers with a republican sounding name that show up with endorsements of Wally Herger, Dan Logue, Doug LaMalfa, and Jane Dolan??? It leaves you thinking, how did she get on there? As a county chairman I get a lot of calls from angry voters wanting to know how this happened and how can they stop it! All I can say is pay close attention to the asterisks and look for the official logo of the republican party when casting your vote.

With all of this considered, the Butte County Republican Party recently decided to get more involved in local elections. We have been actively vetting candidates to determine whether or not they match our values and deserve our support. We have already made some endorsements this year and we plan to make more. We will do our best to publicize our endorsements so that the voting public will know where we stand and who we support.

Our process is by no means perfect. We have a general set of rules (our bylaws) that we have to follow. All of our members are elected to the positions they hold, and it takes a 2/3 vote to cast an endorsement, so it’s not an easy process. Because we have members from throughout the county (Chico, Paradise, Oroville, Biggs, etc) we have members who can look at candidates from an objective viewpoint and decide if we should be supporting them or not. They’re also real people too, with jobs and kids and their own individual priorities. They have the same capacity for human error as you or I, but they’re good-hearted people and I have faith in them.

One of our general guidelines is that we try not to favor one Republican over another. When republicans face each other on the ballot, the party should generally let the voters decide for themselves. The exception to this would be if a flat-out liberal RINO was running and we felt an obligation to point this out. There have been mistakes made over the years though, and the process is not perfect.

All of this leads up to the current election, and more specifically the Chico City Council race. Anyone who pays attention knows we have a liberal majority on the Chico City Council, and that the lone conservative, Larry Wahl, is leaving the council. While they are not allowed to list their party designation on the ballot, it’s hardly a secret where any of them stand. It is however, perfectly legal and just for political parties to tell voters who we support and why. To suggest otherwise would be a violation of our 1st Amendment rights.

Although we haven’t taken a stand in every race, we did in the Chico City Council race. You can stop by Republican Headquarters on the corner of East and Cohasset (the old Hollywood Video building) and find out more. Currently we support the following candidates:

Chico City Council:

Bob Kromer
Mark Sorensen
Bob Evans

Chico Unified School District:

Erik Lyon
Sean Worthington
Dean Stefanides

For more races, stop by HQ or check out our website at www.butterepublicans.com

Thank you all again for being patient readers. If you have questions about our endorsements please post them and I will try to get back to you with an answer.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.